Research & Practice · White Paper
From Measurement to Impact
Why small business programs need Impact Systems — a research-oriented synthesis of what six independent evidence bases agree on: the field is data-rich, evidence-constrained, and the fix is architectural.
Written primarily for funders and public investors in small-business support. Program operators, economic-development leaders, and technology partners are secondary readers.
Core Proposition
Small business programs do not need better counting. They need Impact Systems: operating infrastructure that links the entrepreneur, the intervention, the outcome, and the evidence — so programs can improve impact and prove it.
What's Inside
1
The proof-of-value problem. Why distributed entrepreneurship work loses budget arguments to concentrated business-attraction projects.
2
Four evidence functions, one common confusion. Separating performance measurement, outcome monitoring, impact evaluation, and impact management.
3
The evidence gap, by the numbers. GAO, OEDC, IEDC, NIST MEP, and philanthropy research arriving at the same conclusion from different directions.
4
The impact system architecture. A 10-principle framework and an 8-stage operating loop where measurement is stage five, not the whole system.
5
Implications for funders, operators, and vendors. What each audience should ask, fund, or build differently—and where Catalyzer itself falls short of the standard.